Blog Details

The Recruiting Treadmill: What a Shrinking Field Does to Your Support Cost

The Recruiting Treadmill: What a Shrinking Field Does to Your Support Cost

  • Direct Selling
  • 9 Views

Public filings show direct sellers recruiting hundreds of thousands to end the year flat. What that does to direct selling consultant support cost.

Field economics

Direct sellers recruit constantly to stand still. Support models get sized to the recruiting number and paid for out of the retained one, and the gap between those two has been widening for four years.

358,316People recruited by one public direct seller in 2025, ending the year with 87 fewer licensed representatives
-28.8%US direct sellers since the 2021 peak, from 7.3 million to 5.2 million
70.3%Of one company's sales leaders re-qualified, meaning roughly 30% annual attrition among its best performers

Every direct selling company knows its recruiting number. It is on the board slide, it is in the field incentive, and it is the figure that gets celebrated at convention. Far fewer companies can tell you what it costs to support the people that number produces, or how much of that cost is spent on consultants who will not be active in ninety days.

The gap is not hypothetical and it is not hidden. It is disclosed, in audited filings, by the public companies in this industry. What follows uses their numbers rather than anybody's estimates.

What the filings actually show

CompanyDisclosed in FY2025 or FY2026What it means
Primerica358,316 new recruits in 2025, 48,722 newly licensed, net licensed representatives down by 87 across the yearRecruited a stadium's worth of people to finish the year marginally smaller. The filing describes a continuous recruiting cycle as a key component of the distribution model
Herbalife70.3% of sales leaders re-qualified over the twelve months to January 2026Roughly 30% annual attrition among the elite tier. Attrition among the far larger rank-and-file base is not disclosed and will be higher
MedifastAverage active earning OPTAVIA coaches down 40.6% year over year in Q4 2025A coach base losing two fifths of its earners in a year, against revenue down 36%
Educational Development2,700 brand partners added in the year, ending with 4,300 active against 7,800 the year beforeContinuous recruiting against a 45% decline in the active field

Primerica is the clearest case because both halves are in the same filing. 358,316 people recruited. Eighty-seven fewer licensed representatives at the end of the year than at the start. Recruiting itself fell 20% against 2024, when the figure was 445,425. Whatever support those 358,316 people consumed was consumed by a population that, net, did not grow.

The industry context

This is not four companies having a bad run. US direct selling retail sales peaked at $42.7 billion in 2021 and reached $34.2 billion in 2025, four consecutive years of decline and now below the 2019 baseline. Over the same period the number of US direct sellers fell from 7.3 million to 5.2 million, a drop of 28.8%.

Globally the shape is the same and milder: WFDSA reported $163.9 billion in 2024 against a 2021 peak of $173.4 billion. Note that global data lags US data by roughly a year, and that WFDSA restates prior years between report editions, so the two series should not be stitched together.

Why this is an argument for changing the support model rather than cutting it

A shrinking field does not produce proportionally less support demand. New consultants are the heaviest support users and recruiting is still running at volume. What falls is the revenue base carrying the cost. That is the specific condition under which support cost per productive consultant rises even as headcount falls, and it is the condition most direct sellers are in right now.

Costing it properly

Most direct selling companies measure support cost per contact or per consultant enrolled. Neither is the number that matters. Cost per productive consultant is, because it prices the support you spend on people who leave.

Step 01EnrolledThe recruiting numberEveryone who joined in the period. This is the figure the incentive plan optimises and the one support gets sized against.
Step 02ActivatedPlaced a first orderA meaningful subset. Everyone between step one and step two consumed onboarding support and produced nothing.
Step 03Still active at 90 daysThe real denominatorThe population your support investment is actually buying. Divide total support cost by this number, not by step one.

Run that division and two things usually become visible at once. The first is that a large share of support effort is spent in the first thirty days on people who will not be there in ninety. The second is that the fixed-cost support model, sized once and adjusted annually, is the wrong shape for a population that turns over several times a year.

Where the model has to change

Support capacity should follow enrolment, not headcount

Enrolment is spiky. It follows conventions, promotions and seasonal recruiting pushes. A support team sized to average active field size is overwhelmed after every recruiting event and idle between them. Variable capacity is not a cost-cutting measure here, it is a shape-matching one.

Separate the first thirty days from everything else

New consultant contacts are predictable, repetitive and teachable: how the back office works, how to place a first order, how a party gets set up, what the plan pays. That queue can be handled by trained agents at scale. The tenured field asks harder questions and deserves harder-to-find people. Mixing them means paying tenured rates for password resets and giving plan disputes to whoever is free.

Measure what the support actually produced

If support is a retention lever, hold it to a retention number. Ninety-day survival by enrolment cohort, split by whether the consultant was contacted in week one, is a harder metric to collect than CSAT and considerably more useful.

Three things that do not work

  • Cutting support in proportion to the field. The contacts come disproportionately from new consultants, and recruiting has not slowed as fast as the active base has shrunk.
  • Pushing everything to the upline. Sponsors are unpaid, untrained and inconsistent, and in a shrinking field many new consultants are sponsored by someone who joined four months ago.
  • Deflecting the first thirty days into a knowledge base. These are the contacts most likely to be answered by self-service, and also the ones where an unanswered question turns into a consultant who never activates.

The short version

Public filings in this industry describe companies recruiting hundreds of thousands of people to finish the year flat or smaller, while the US field has shrunk almost 29% since 2021. Support sized to the recruiting number and paid for by the retained one gets more expensive every year that gap widens. Price it per productive consultant, shape capacity to enrolment rather than headcount, split the first thirty days from the tenured field, and measure the support against ninety-day survival rather than satisfaction.

Centro sizes direct selling support to the shape of the field rather than to a headcount set once a year. Our work with The Pampered Chef started at 30 full-time agents in 2019 and grew into full-service global support as the requirement changed.

Read the full case study

Get a costed model for your field

Sources